OpenInterpretability
  • Ekbasis
  • Guide
  • Pricing
  • Research
  • Lab
  • Tools
  • Notes
  • Registry
  • Manifesto
Sign inGet API keyAPI key
OpenInterpretability

Ekbasis API: know what an action will do before your agent runs it. From an independent lab for AI-agent safety. Open weights, Apache-2.0.

Get your API key
Ekbasis API
  • Console · sign in
  • Getting started
  • Pricing
  • For agents (agents.md)
  • Results and models
  • Client and CLI
  • Cookbook
The lab
  • About the lab
  • Open tools
  • Observatory
  • ProbeBench
  • InterpScore
  • Academy
Research
  • Manifesto
  • Roadmap
  • Papers & posts
  • Docs
Community
  • GitHub org
  • Notebooks
  • SDK (openinterp)
  • HuggingFace
© 2026 OpenInterpretability — Apache-2.0 for code, CC-BY 4.0 for docs.Built in public.
Research
publishedchain-of-thoughtfaithfulnessreasoning modelsmonitoringlate layersinterpretability-as-auditQwen3.6-27B

The Late Channel: Chain-of-Thought Becomes Causal and Decodable Only Late in a 27B Reasoning Agent

CoT is causal for the answer — and for the agent's action — only when it changes the outcome; that causal content consolidates in the same late band (L51–63), a readable monitoring locus

Caio VicentinoORCID 2026-06-18 Zenodo · CC-BY-4.0 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20752895
Paper PDF + permanent DOI (Zenodo, CC-BY-4.0)Ledgers + eval (GitHub: openinterp-swebench-harness)

The Late Channel

Chain-of-Thought Becomes Causal and Decodable Only Late in a 27B Reasoning Agent

Caio Vicentino · OpenInterpretability · Published 2026-06-18. Zenodo · CC-BY-4.0 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.20752895.

The first paper of the interpretability-as-audit phase of the arc. The full PDF (3 figures, logit-lens control, 37/37 eval) is the Zenodo record — this page is the on-site summary.


Abstract

In a 27B reasoning agent (Qwen3.6-27B), chain-of-thought is causal for the answer — and for the agent's downstream action — only when the reasoning changes the outcome; when the model already knows the answer, the CoT is performative (44/60 Tier-A cases). The causal content of the reasoning consolidates in the same late layer band (L51–63) that carries action commitment, with the largest reasoning→answer transfer at L59 (+2.72), confirmed against a logit-lens control that rules out mere output-format consolidation. Faithfulness is conditional, and the late state is a readable, causal locus for monitoring reasoning agents.

Why it matters

CoT monitoring is the leading practical hope for overseeing reasoning agents — but it inherits an assumption: that the visible reasoning is the computation. This paper shows the assumption holds exactly when the reasoning is load-bearing, and fails when it is not — and gives the monitoring alternative: the late internal band where the causal content actually consolidates, for answers and for agent actions alike.

Key results

  • Tier-A (n=60): reasoning→answer transfer peaks late (+2.72 @L59); performative in 44/60 already-known cases.
  • Tier-B (n=32): the same late band carries reasoning→agent action transfer.
  • Logit-lens control closes the "late = output formatting" alternative.
  • Every number recomputes from public ledgers (37/37 checks).